Shared interpretation boundary

The displayed values are uncalibrated model scores. Input uncertainty is represented by independent Gaussian samples rather than real NICER or LIGO posterior samples. The central 95% score range is not a confidence interval or composition posterior, and SHAP explains fitted-model behaviour rather than physical truth.

Baseline demonstration with classifier-score summaries and a mass–radius view of the restricted synthetic model space
Baseline synthetic-classifier interface; screenshot captured from the reviewed local build.

01 · Baseline demonstration

APR-1-surrogate versus fixed-CFL4 scores

Explore how a retained classifier responds to selected mass, radius, and tidal inputs inside one restricted synthetic model comparison.

  • Restricted repository-model comparison
  • Independent Gaussian input sampling
  • Uncalibrated classifier scores

Hosted on Streamlit Community Cloud; it may take a moment to wake.

Perturbation-sensitivity demonstration with classifier-score summaries and a mass–radius view of the perturbed synthetic model space
Perturbation-sensitivity interface; screenshot captured from the reviewed local build.

02 · Perturbation sensitivity

Synthetic perturbations, without compactness as a feature

Explore score sensitivity in the retained perturbed workflow. This tests one declared synthetic error construction; it does not reproduce observational uncertainty.

  • Compactness excluded from classifier inputs
  • Mass–radius and mass–radius–tidal modes
  • No phase-general or observational claim

Hosted on Streamlit Community Cloud; it may take a moment to wake.

Development boundary

Independent post-thesis extensions.

The demonstrations were developed after the thesis as separate classification extensions. They are not thesis-submission artifacts, observational inference services, or official companion applications to the BSk24 preprint. Scientific interpretation and responsibility remain with Ioannis Papathanasiou.